Termination w.r.t. Q proof of TRS/TRCSRExIntrod_GM01

Termination w.r.t. Q of the following Term Rewriting System could not be shown:

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

Q restricted rewrite system:
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.

Using Dependency Pairs [1,13] we result in the following initial DP problem:
Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)
INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, L))) → ADX(L)
PROPER(incr(X)) → INCR(proper(X))
PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → TAIL(active(X))
HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
INCR(ok(X)) → INCR(X)
ADX(mark(X)) → ADX(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(tail(X)) → TAIL(proper(X))
ACTIVE(adx(X)) → ADX(active(X))
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
HEAD(ok(X)) → HEAD(X)
ACTIVE(zeros) → CONS(0, zeros)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, L))) → CONS(X, adx(L))
TAIL(ok(X)) → TAIL(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, L))) → INCR(L)
PROPER(adx(X)) → ADX(proper(X))
ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, L))) → S(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
ACTIVE(head(X)) → HEAD(active(X))
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(nats) → ADX(zeros)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(active(X1), X2)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
PROPER(head(X)) → HEAD(proper(X))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, L))) → INCR(cons(X, adx(L)))
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → INCR(active(X))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, L))) → CONS(s(X), incr(L))
ADX(ok(X)) → ADX(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)
INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, L))) → ADX(L)
PROPER(incr(X)) → INCR(proper(X))
PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → TAIL(active(X))
HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
INCR(ok(X)) → INCR(X)
ADX(mark(X)) → ADX(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(tail(X)) → TAIL(proper(X))
ACTIVE(adx(X)) → ADX(active(X))
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
HEAD(ok(X)) → HEAD(X)
ACTIVE(zeros) → CONS(0, zeros)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, L))) → CONS(X, adx(L))
TAIL(ok(X)) → TAIL(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, L))) → INCR(L)
PROPER(adx(X)) → ADX(proper(X))
ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, L))) → S(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
ACTIVE(head(X)) → HEAD(active(X))
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(nats) → ADX(zeros)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(active(X1), X2)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
PROPER(head(X)) → HEAD(proper(X))
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, L))) → INCR(cons(X, adx(L)))
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → INCR(active(X))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, L))) → CONS(s(X), incr(L))
ADX(ok(X)) → ADX(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We deleted some edges using various graph approximations

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)
INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, L))) → ADX(L)
PROPER(incr(X)) → INCR(proper(X))
PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → TAIL(active(X))
HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
INCR(ok(X)) → INCR(X)
ADX(mark(X)) → ADX(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
TOP(ok(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → S(active(X))
PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(tail(X)) → TAIL(proper(X))
ACTIVE(adx(X)) → ADX(active(X))
HEAD(ok(X)) → HEAD(X)
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
TOP(mark(X)) → PROPER(X)
ACTIVE(zeros) → CONS(0, zeros)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, L))) → CONS(X, adx(L))
TAIL(ok(X)) → TAIL(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, L))) → INCR(L)
PROPER(adx(X)) → ADX(proper(X))
ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, L))) → S(X)
PROPER(s(X)) → S(proper(X))
S(ok(X)) → S(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(head(X)) → HEAD(active(X))
ACTIVE(nats) → ADX(zeros)
CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(active(X1), X2)
TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
PROPER(head(X)) → HEAD(proper(X))
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(adx(cons(X, L))) → INCR(cons(X, adx(L)))
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → INCR(active(X))
ACTIVE(incr(cons(X, L))) → CONS(s(X), incr(L))
ADX(ok(X)) → ADX(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → CONS(proper(X1), proper(X2))
TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The approximation of the Dependency Graph [13,14,18] contains 9 SCCs with 22 less nodes.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)
TAIL(ok(X)) → TAIL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TAIL(mark(X)) → TAIL(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

TAIL(ok(X)) → TAIL(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
TAIL(x1) = TAIL(x1)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
ok(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[TAIL₁, mark_1]

Status:

mark₁: [1]
TAIL₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TAIL(ok(X)) → TAIL(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

TAIL(ok(X)) → TAIL(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
TAIL(x1) = TAIL(x1)
ok(x1) = ok(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[TAIL₁, ok_1]

Status:

TAIL₁: [1]
ok₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HEAD(ok(X)) → HEAD(X)
HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

HEAD(ok(X)) → HEAD(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
HEAD(x1) = HEAD(x1)
ok(x1) = ok(x1)
mark(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[HEAD₁, ok_1]

Status:

ok₁: [1]
HEAD₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

HEAD(mark(X)) → HEAD(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
HEAD(x1) = HEAD(x1)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[HEAD₁, mark_1]

Status:

mark₁: [1]
HEAD₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADX(ok(X)) → ADX(X)
ADX(mark(X)) → ADX(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ADX(ok(X)) → ADX(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ADX(mark(X)) → ADX(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ADX(x1) = ADX(x1)
ok(x1) = ok(x1)
mark(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[ADX₁, ok_1]

Status:

ok₁: [1]
ADX₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ADX(mark(X)) → ADX(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ADX(mark(X)) → ADX(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ADX(x1) = ADX(x1)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[ADX₁, mark_1]

Status:

mark₁: [1]
ADX₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(ok(X)) → S(X)
S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(ok(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = S(x1)
ok(x1) = ok(x1)
mark(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[S₁, ok_1]

Status:

ok₁: [1]
S₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

S(mark(X)) → S(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
S(x1) = S(x1)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[S₁, mark_1]

Status:

mark₁: [1]
S₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)
CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

CONS(mark(X1), X2) → CONS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
CONS(x1, x2) = CONS(x1, x2)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)
ok(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

mark₁: [1]
CONS₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

CONS(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → CONS(X1, X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
CONS(x1, x2) = CONS(x2)
ok(x1) = ok(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

ok₁ > CONS₁

Status:

CONS₁: [1]
ok₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

INCR(ok(X)) → INCR(X)
INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

INCR(ok(X)) → INCR(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
INCR(x1) = INCR(x1)
ok(x1) = ok(x1)
mark(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[INCR₁, ok_1]

Status:

ok₁: [1]
INCR₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

INCR(mark(X)) → INCR(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
INCR(x1) = INCR(x1)
mark(x1) = mark(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[INCR₁, mark_1]

Status:

mark₁: [1]
INCR₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)
PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X1)
PROPER(cons(X1, X2)) → PROPER(X2)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1) = PROPER(x1)
s(x1) = x1
cons(x1, x2) = cons(x1, x2)
incr(x1) = x1
tail(x1) = x1
head(x1) = x1
adx(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

PROPER₁: [1]
cons₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(s(X)) → PROPER(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1) = PROPER(x1)
s(x1) = s(x1)
incr(x1) = x1
tail(x1) = x1
head(x1) = x1
adx(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

PROPER₁: [1]
s₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(tail(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(head(X)) → PROPER(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1) = PROPER(x1)
incr(x1) = x1
tail(x1) = tail(x1)
head(x1) = head(x1)
adx(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

PROPER₁: [1]
head₁: [1]
tail₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)
PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(incr(X)) → PROPER(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1) = PROPER(x1)
incr(x1) = incr(x1)
adx(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[PROPER₁, incr_1]

Status:

incr₁: [1]
PROPER₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

PROPER(adx(X)) → PROPER(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
PROPER(x1) = PROPER(x1)
adx(x1) = adx(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[PROPER₁, adx_1]

Status:

PROPER₁: [1]
adx₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                                  ↳ QDP

                                    ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(cons(X1, X2)) → ACTIVE(X1)
ACTIVE(adx(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE(x1)
head(x1) = x1
cons(x1, x2) = cons(x1, x2)
s(x1) = x1
tail(x1) = x1
adx(x1) = adx(x1)
incr(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[ACTIVE₁, cons_2]

Status:

ACTIVE₁: [1]
adx₁: [1]
cons₂: [2,1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(s(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(tail(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE(x1)
head(x1) = x1
s(x1) = s(x1)
tail(x1) = tail(x1)
incr(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

trivial

Status:

ACTIVE₁: [1]
s₁: [1]
tail₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)
ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(head(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.

ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE(x1)
head(x1) = head(x1)
incr(x1) = x1

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[ACTIVE₁, head_1]

Status:

ACTIVE₁: [1]
head₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
We use the reduction pair processor [13].

The following pairs can be oriented strictly and are deleted.

ACTIVE(incr(X)) → ACTIVE(X)

The remaining pairs can at least be oriented weakly.
none
Used ordering: Combined order from the following AFS and order.
ACTIVE(x1) = ACTIVE(x1)
incr(x1) = incr(x1)

Lexicographic path order with status [19].
Quasi-Precedence:

[ACTIVE₁, incr_1]

Status:

incr₁: [1]
ACTIVE₁: [1]

The following usable rules [14] were oriented: none

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

                ↳ QDPOrderProof

                  ↳ QDP

                    ↳ QDPOrderProof

                      ↳ QDP

                        ↳ QDPOrderProof

                          ↳ QDP

                            ↳ QDPOrderProof

                              ↳ QDP

                                ↳ PisEmptyProof

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
P is empty.
The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.
The TRS P is empty. Hence, there is no (P,Q,R) chain.

↳ QTRS

  ↳ DependencyPairsProof

    ↳ QDP

      ↳ EdgeDeletionProof

        ↳ QDP

          ↳ DependencyGraphProof

            ↳ AND

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

              ↳ QDP

Q DP problem:
The TRS P consists of the following rules:

TOP(ok(X)) → TOP(active(X))
TOP(mark(X)) → TOP(proper(X))

The TRS R consists of the following rules:

active(incr(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(incr(cons(X, L))) → mark(cons(s(X), incr(L)))
active(adx(nil)) → mark(nil)
active(adx(cons(X, L))) → mark(incr(cons(X, adx(L))))
active(nats) → mark(adx(zeros))
active(zeros) → mark(cons(0, zeros))
active(head(cons(X, L))) → mark(X)
active(tail(cons(X, L))) → mark(L)
active(incr(X)) → incr(active(X))
active(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(active(X1), X2)
active(s(X)) → s(active(X))
active(adx(X)) → adx(active(X))
active(head(X)) → head(active(X))
active(tail(X)) → tail(active(X))
incr(mark(X)) → mark(incr(X))
cons(mark(X1), X2) → mark(cons(X1, X2))
s(mark(X)) → mark(s(X))
adx(mark(X)) → mark(adx(X))
head(mark(X)) → mark(head(X))
tail(mark(X)) → mark(tail(X))
proper(incr(X)) → incr(proper(X))
proper(nil) → ok(nil)
proper(cons(X1, X2)) → cons(proper(X1), proper(X2))
proper(s(X)) → s(proper(X))
proper(adx(X)) → adx(proper(X))
proper(nats) → ok(nats)
proper(zeros) → ok(zeros)
proper(0) → ok(0)
proper(head(X)) → head(proper(X))
proper(tail(X)) → tail(proper(X))
incr(ok(X)) → ok(incr(X))
cons(ok(X1), ok(X2)) → ok(cons(X1, X2))
s(ok(X)) → ok(s(X))
adx(ok(X)) → ok(adx(X))
head(ok(X)) → ok(head(X))
tail(ok(X)) → ok(tail(X))
top(mark(X)) → top(proper(X))
top(ok(X)) → top(active(X))

Q is empty.
We have to consider all minimal (P,Q,R)-chains.